Axis 2400 Video Server < WORKING >

Before the Axis 2400, if you wanted "IP surveillance," you were building a bespoke system. The 2400 changed the rules for three reasons:

Is the Axis 2400 useful today? Sort of... but only for hobbyists.

| Feature | Specification | | :--- | :--- | | Video Input | 1 x Composite BNC (75 Ohm) | | Video Loop-through | 1 x Composite BNC (Pass-through) | | Compression | Motion JPEG | | Max Frame Rate | 30 fps (NTSC) / 25 fps (PAL) | | Network Interface | 10/100 Mbit Ethernet (RJ-45) | | Alarm I/O | 1 Input / 1 Output (TTL level) | | Serial Port | RS-232 (for PTZ control) | | Power | External Power Supply (DC) | | OS | Embedded Linux (ETRAX) |

  • RS-232 Serial Port: A unique feature of the Axis 2400 is the RS-232 serial interface. This was commonly used to connect Pan/Tilt/Zoom (PTZ) cameras. The server could transmit PTZ control signals over the network, allowing operators to move the camera remotely via the web interface.
  • Pre- and Post-Alarm Buffer: The Axis 2400 includes an internal image buffer (RAM). This allows the device to record images before an alarm is triggered. This is crucial for catching the events leading up to an incident (e.g., seeing who broke the window, not just the aftermath).
  • Motion Detection: The unit includes built-in video motion detection capabilities, allowing it to trigger recording or alerts based on changes in the video scene, reducing the need for storage of empty footage.
  • Axis later released the Axis 2400+, which was a significant revision. While the chassis looked identical, the "+" model featured upgraded hardware that allowed for full frame rate (25/30 fps) at D1 resolution on a single channel, and better chip-level performance. The "Plus" model also introduced basic support for audio (though it required a separate accessory). When searching for used units today, the 2400+ is vastly preferable to the original 2400.

    Why did the Axis 2400 disappear? Three major reasons:

    Before the Axis 2400, if you wanted "IP surveillance," you were building a bespoke system. The 2400 changed the rules for three reasons:

    Is the Axis 2400 useful today? Sort of... but only for hobbyists.

    | Feature | Specification | | :--- | :--- | | Video Input | 1 x Composite BNC (75 Ohm) | | Video Loop-through | 1 x Composite BNC (Pass-through) | | Compression | Motion JPEG | | Max Frame Rate | 30 fps (NTSC) / 25 fps (PAL) | | Network Interface | 10/100 Mbit Ethernet (RJ-45) | | Alarm I/O | 1 Input / 1 Output (TTL level) | | Serial Port | RS-232 (for PTZ control) | | Power | External Power Supply (DC) | | OS | Embedded Linux (ETRAX) |

  • RS-232 Serial Port: A unique feature of the Axis 2400 is the RS-232 serial interface. This was commonly used to connect Pan/Tilt/Zoom (PTZ) cameras. The server could transmit PTZ control signals over the network, allowing operators to move the camera remotely via the web interface.
  • Pre- and Post-Alarm Buffer: The Axis 2400 includes an internal image buffer (RAM). This allows the device to record images before an alarm is triggered. This is crucial for catching the events leading up to an incident (e.g., seeing who broke the window, not just the aftermath).
  • Motion Detection: The unit includes built-in video motion detection capabilities, allowing it to trigger recording or alerts based on changes in the video scene, reducing the need for storage of empty footage.
  • Axis later released the Axis 2400+, which was a significant revision. While the chassis looked identical, the "+" model featured upgraded hardware that allowed for full frame rate (25/30 fps) at D1 resolution on a single channel, and better chip-level performance. The "Plus" model also introduced basic support for audio (though it required a separate accessory). When searching for used units today, the 2400+ is vastly preferable to the original 2400.

    Why did the Axis 2400 disappear? Three major reasons: