Grille De Cotation Dessin Du Bonhomme Goodenough Today
Note: Modern psychology discourages labeling young children with a fixed "IQ" from drawing tests, preferring "Cognitive Maturity Quotient."
This section moves from "has a face" to "understands the components of a face."
The examiner uses a dichotomous scoring system: Present (1 point) or Absent (0 points). However, some items earn points for quality (e.g., "Eyes: 2 points for two eyes + 1 point for pupils + 1 point for eyebrows").
Here is a simplified extract of the classic scoring grid:
| Category | Scoring Criteria | Point Value | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Head | Presence of a clear shape (circle, oval, square) | 1 | | Eyes | Two eyes drawn | 2 | | | Detail: Pupils, lashes, or eyebrows | 1 each | | Nose | Presence of a nose (line or dot) | 1 | | | Two-dimensional nose (nostrils) | 1 | | Mouth | Presence of a mouth (line or curve) | 1 | | | Lips or teeth indicated | 1 | | Hair | Presence of hair (scribble on top of head is fine) | 1 | | Neck | Neck connecting head to trunk (not just overlapping) | 1 | | Trunk | Presence of a torso (not just legs attached to head) | 2 | | Arms | Two arms attached to trunk (not to head) | 2 | | Hands | Wrist or hand distinct from arm | 1 | | Fingers | At least 5 fingers in total (counted together) | 1 | | Legs | Two legs attached to base of trunk | 2 | | Feet | Two feet (distinct from legs – shoes count) | 2 | | Clothing | At least one clothing item (hat, tie, buttons, pants) | 1 | | Proportion | Total height of figure > head width x 2 | 1 | | Motor coordination | Lines are firm, not shaky or gaping | 1 |
Before the Goodenough grid, assessing a child’s intelligence was a verbal, often intimidating process. Non-verbal children, shy children, or those with language barriers were at a disadvantage. Goodenough hypothesized that the ability to draw a recognizable human figure is not an artistic skill, but a conceptual one. The child is not drawing what they see (a specific person), but what they know (the abstract concept of a human body).
The more details a child includes—and the more logically they organize those details—the more advanced their cognitive schema. The Grille de cotation was born to quantify this knowledge.
Most searches for "grille de cotation dessin du bonhomme" actually lead to the Harris revision (Draw-A-Person: DAP). Harris improved Goodenough’s grid by:
In clinical practice today, the Koppitz Emotional Indicators (1970s) are often merged with the Goodenough grid to assess emotional and social maturity alongside cognitive.
Goodenough noted that certain items appear only at specific developmental stages. For example: grille de cotation dessin du bonhomme goodenough
If a 6-year-old draws a neck, joints, and a nose, they score significantly higher than average.
Ici, on évalue la motricité fine et la pensée conceptuelle :
The clinical observation room was quiet, smelling faintly of wax crayons and floor wax. Dr. Aris looked at seven-year-old Bastien, who sat with his legs dangling off the chair, staring at a single sheet of white paper.
"Bastien," the doctor said softly, "I want you to draw a picture of a man. Make the very best picture you can. Take your time and work very carefully."
Bastien picked up a charcoal-grey crayon. In the world of the Goodenough-Harris scoring grid, every stroke Bastien made was a data point. To the boy, it was a resurrection of someone he missed.
He started with the head—a wobbly circle. Dr. Aris noted: Point 1: Head present.Then came the trunk. A sturdy rectangle. Point 3: Trunk present.
As Bastien worked, he became more meticulous. He added two vertical lines for legs and two horizontal ones for arms. He didn't just stop at the limbs; he added small, circular joints at the elbows and knees. Dr. Aris’s pen scratched against his clipboard. Bastien was showing "motor coordination" and "conceptual complexity"—the grid was climbing.
"He needs to see," Bastien whispered. He added two dots for eyes, a line for a nose, and a wide, straight line for a mouth.
Then came the detail that stopped the doctor’s pen. Bastien spent three minutes drawing a hat—a very specific, tall fedora with a ribbon. Then, he added five distinct fingers on each hand and tiny laces on the shoes. This section moves from "has a face" to
On the Goodenough scale, these details—clothing, finger count, and proportion—pushed Bastien’s "Mental Age" score significantly higher than his chronological age. But for Bastien, the drawing wasn't a test of intelligence. It was a bridge.
When he finished, he pushed the paper toward Dr. Aris. The "Man" on the paper looked remarkably like the photograph on the mantle in Bastien’s hallway—the father who had gone away to sea a year ago.
Dr. Aris looked at the grid: 42 points. Highly superior cognitive development. But as he looked at the boy’s hopeful eyes, he saw what the grid couldn't measure: the precision of a child’s love, rendered in charcoal grey. What is the "Grille de Cotation Goodenough"?
If you are looking for the actual technical framework for your own records or study, here is the essence of the Goodenough Draw-a-Man Test:
Purpose: Developed by Florence Goodenough in 1926, it is a non-verbal psychological personality and cognitive test used to estimate a child's mental age through their drawing of a human figure.
The Scoring (The Grid): The "grille" typically consists of 51 points (or items). A child receives one point for each detail present, such as:
Basic Requirements: Presence of head, legs, arms, and trunk.
Attachment: Are the limbs attached to the trunk in the right places? Clothing: Presence of buttons, sleeves, or a hat.
Fine Details: Fingers (correct number), neck, eyes (including pupils/brows), and ears. In clinical practice today, the Koppitz Emotional Indicators
Proportion: Is the head the right size relative to the body?
Calculation: The total points are converted into a "Mental Age" using a standard table, which is then compared to the child's actual chronological age to determine a developmental ratio.
La grille de cotation du test du bonhomme de Goodenough (ou Goodenough-Harris)
est un outil d'évaluation de la maturité intellectuelle et du développement cognitif chez l'enfant, généralement âgé de 3 à 13 ans
. Le principe repose sur l'attribution de points pour chaque détail corporel ou vestimentaire représenté, reflétant ainsi la précision du schéma corporel de l'enfant. Structure de la Grille de Cotation Le système original de Florence Goodenough comporte
de contrôle, tandis que la révision de Harris peut aller jusqu'à 73 items. Les points sont répartis en plusieurs catégories clés : GOODENOUGH DRAW – A – PERSON TEST
La grille de cotation du test du bonhomme de Goodenough (1926) est un outil psychométrique permettant d'évaluer la maturité intellectuelle des enfants. Elle repose sur un système de points précis (jusqu'à 51 ou 52 points selon les versions) attribués en fonction de la présence de détails anatomiques et de la précision des proportions. 1. Principes de cotation
Le principe est simple : on accorde 1 point par élément présent et correctement représenté. Si le dessin n'est qu'un gribouillage non reconnaissable (Catégorie A), le score est de 0 ou 1. Dès que la figure humaine est identifiable (Catégorie B), on utilise la grille détaillée. 2. Principaux critères de la grille La grille se divise en plusieurs catégories de détails :
Le test d'un dessin d'un bonhomme comme contrôle ... - Persée