Latin Adultery Sophia Lomeli 2021 May 2026

| Method | Description | |--------|-------------| | Corpus Compilation | Built a searchable corpus of ~3,200 Latin passages containing the target lexical items, drawn from the Thesaurus Linguae Latinae (TLL), the Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (CIL), and the Digest of Justinian. | | Quantitative Lexicography | Used AntConc to generate frequency curves, collocation tables, and semantic prosody analyses for each term across different genres (law, poetry, epigraphy). | | Legal Exegesis | Conducted close readings of the Lex Iulia de Adulteriis (AD 18) and its commentaries (e.g., Aelius Stilo), comparing statutory language with juristic glosses in the Digest. | | Literary Analysis | Applied New Historicist and gender‑theoretic lenses to key literary passages (e.g., Ovid 1.12‑14; Juvenal 9.101‑115; Catullus 5) to reveal rhetorical strategies surrounding adultery. | | Comparative Chronology | Mapped semantic changes across three chronological blocks: Republican (509‑27 BCE), Imperial (27 BCE‑AD 284), Late Imperial/Christian (AD 284‑500). |

I assume you mean Sophia Lomelí’s 2021 study (article or chapter) addressing adultery in Latin texts or Roman legal/cultural contexts. If you meant a different work or year, tell me and I’ll adjust. latin adultery sophia lomeli 2021

| Reviewer | Publication | Main Praise | Main Critique | |----------|-------------|-------------|---------------| | M. R. Cox | Journal of Roman Studies | “Elegant integration of quantitative lexical data with nuanced legal analysis.” | Calls for a deeper look at provincial (non‑Italian) inscriptions, which may show regional variation. | | A. B. Simmons | Classical Philology | “A valuable resource for anyone teaching Roman family law.” | Suggests the study could have explored comparative Greek terminology (e.g., moicheía). | | J. L. Peterson | American Journal of Philology | “Ground‑breaking in revealing the moral‑political uses of adultery accusations.” | Notes that the article’s discussion of post‑imperial Christian reinterpretations is brief. | | Method | Description | |--------|-------------| | Corpus

Overall, the article is widely regarded as authoritative on the lexical and legal aspects of Roman adultery, while encouraging future work on regional and comparative dimensions. I assume you mean Sophia Lomelí’s 2021 study

Adultery is generally defined as the act of sexual intercourse with someone other than one's spouse, often considered a breach of marital vows. Laws and social views on adultery vary significantly across cultures and jurisdictions.

| Author / Work | Representation of Adultery | Functional Purpose | |---------------|----------------------------|--------------------| | Ovid, Ars Amatoria (1.12‑14) | Depicts the art of seducing a married woman; uses adulterium humorously. | Satiric subversion of Augustan moral law. | | Juvenal, Satire 9 | Rips the elite for their adulterous lifestyles; mixes adulterium with luxuria. | Social critique; reinforces moral panic. | | Catullus 5 | Celebrates a secret love affair (implied adulterous) with fornicatio overtones. | Personal lyric, not legal commentary. | | Tacitus, Annals (13.38) | Reports the trial of a senator for adulterium against his wife; shows the political weaponisation of the charge. | Demonstrates legal reality and elite vulnerability. |

Observation: Literary texts often play with lexical ambiguity to either mask illicit behaviour (fornicatio) or expose it (adulterium) depending on the author’s agenda.