Viral Liadani Prank Ojol Lagi Indo18 Updated -

The combination of "Prank" and the "Indo18" tag suggests a specific type of viral phenomenon often seen on platforms like Twitter (X).

| Actor | Action | Rationale | |-------|--------|-----------| | Gojek | Push notification to all users: “Kami tidak pernah mengirimkan pesan seperti ini. Selalu cek detail driver di aplikasi resmi.” | Reinforce that the brand never uses external links. | | Grab | In‑app banner with a QR‑code linking to a safety guide on “How to verify driver identity”. | Provide a tangible verification tool. | | Indo18 | Removed the redirect URL after a takedown request from the Ministry of Communication. | Avoid being a vector for unwanted traffic. | | MAFIND (Fact‑check) | Published a video debunking the screenshots, highlighting key visual cues that betray a forgery (e.g., mismatched font weight). | Equip the public with detection skills. | | Police cyber‑unit | Logged the incident as “online fraud/harassment” and opened a case to trace the creator of the shortened URL. | Deter future malicious link‑sharing. | viral liadani prank ojol lagi indo18 updated

| Dimension | Observed Outcome | |-----------|------------------| | User confusion | Spike in support tickets to Gojek/Grab (≈ 2,300 tickets in 48 h) asking whether a driver named Liadani existed. | | Safety concerns | Some users reported feeling unsafe because they attempted to meet a “driver” who never arrived, prompting a brief delay in ride acceptance. | | Traffic to Indo18 | Short‑term surge in unique visitors (≈ 12 % increase on the day of the prank), as captured by public site‑analytics tools. | | Brand reputation | Both ride‑hailing platforms had to issue clarifying statements; no lasting damage, but the episode reinforced the need for ongoing user‑education campaigns. | | Regulatory attention | The Indonesian Ministry of Communication and Information Technology reminded digital‑service providers to enforce stricter anti‑phishing guidelines. | The combination of "Prank" and the "Indo18" tag

[Opening shot – rider picks up a passenger in a bustling Jakarta street]
Passenger (voice‑over, muffled): “Pak, I need you to deliver this to Bali—but only if the traffic light at Merdeka turns green exactly three times in a row.”
Rider (confused, whispers to camera): “What? That’s… impossible.”
[Cut to rider looking at a tiny, glitter‑covered envelope]
Passenger (still muffled): “And make sure you take a selfie with the Giant Durian statue on the roof of Mall Ciputra before you go.”
[Rider pulls out a selfie stick, looks at the camera, shrugs]
[Fast‑forward montage – rider stops at every traffic light, counts greens, attempts a selfie with a durian‑shaped inflatable toy on a rooftop]
[Final reveal – the envelope opens to a rubber chicken]
Rider (laughing): “Liadani! You got me!”
[Text overlay: “#LiadaniPrank – Tag us with your version!”] but spin‑offs (e.g.

| Question | Answer | |----------|--------| | Is the Liadani prank legal? | Yes – the original videos were filmed with the rider’s consent and did not obstruct traffic. Always obtain permission from any driver and avoid actions that could endanger road users. | | Can I use the “Indo18” name in my video? | You may reference the trend, but avoid implying an official endorsement unless you have a partnership. Use generic terms (“the Liadani trend”) to stay safe. | | What if I’m an ojol driver and want to join? | Many drivers have posted their own versions using the hashtag. Just follow the safety disclaimer and keep the prank short, funny, and respectful to passengers. | | Will brand deals be possible? | Yes – the original Indo18 partnership with Gojek shows that transport‑related brands are keen on authentic, user‑generated content. Pitch a clear concept and include view‑count metrics. | | How long will the trend last? | Short‑form trends typically peak within 2‑4 weeks, but spin‑offs (e.g., “Liadani Food‑Delivery” or “Liadani Travel‑Guide”) can keep the meme alive for months. |