wifi kill github

The term "WiFi Kill" became popular with the rise of Android apps (like WiFi Kill by bponury) that could disconnect other devices from a shared access point. The concept relies on a deauthentication attack (deauth attack), which is a type of denial-of-service (DoS) attack targeting the 802.11 Wi-Fi protocol.

Use these instead of "wifi kill" tools unless you have explicit authorization and a safe test environment:

  • Enterprise tools:
  • Parental controls:
  • Network testing and security research:
  • Monitoring and detection:

  • The "wifi kill github" search sometimes leads to more constructive tools. Here are valuable alternatives for legitimate pentesters:

    | Project | Purpose | Why Use It | |---------|---------|-------------| | Wifite | Automated wireless audit | Runs multiple attacks (including deauth for WPS/WPA handshakes) ethically. | | Airgeddon | Multi-Band wireless auditor | Has deauth for PMF detection and client isolation tests. | | Fluxion | Evil twin attack | Uses deauth to force reconnections to a fake AP – great for phishing awareness. | | PMKID | WPA3/2 handshake capture | No deauth needed - more stealthy. |

    These tools often include deauth capabilities but frame them within a responsible pentesting workflow.


    Bettercap is the modern standard for network attacks. It is a powerful, modular framework written in Go.

    What it is: "WiFi kill" typically refers to tools or scripts (often found on GitHub) that can disrupt, block, or disconnect devices from a Wi‑Fi network. Implementations vary: some use ARP spoofing/poisoning, Deauthentication (802.11 deauth) frames, DHCP spoofing, or router-level exploits to remove or prevent clients from accessing the network.

    Common techniques

    Typical usage contexts

    Legal & ethical considerations

    Security risks for operators

    Safer alternatives

    If you found a GitHub project

    If you want, I can:

    WiFiKill is an Android application that uses ARP poisoning to disrupt network connections for other devices on a shared network, functioning as a "Hacktool". Academic analysis, such as that in the SlowDroid paper, documents its capability as a mobile-based Denial of Service (DoS) attack tool, which requires root privileges to operate. For more details, visit ResearchGate Information Security Stack Exchange

    Yes, many. Some even have GUI windows. But Windows Defender or antivirus will flag them as hack tools (and rightly so). Running unknown executables from random GitHub repos is a massive security risk—they could be backdoored.